REiNS International Collaboration
REiNS is an international consortium of researchers, clinicians, and people affected by NF1 and schwannomatosis whose shared goal is to advance clinical trial methodology for NF/SWN. Founded in 2011, REiNS has published four supplement issues developing standardized, practical, and clinically meaningful outcome measures — endpoints that determine whether treatments in trials actually work. Every person with schwannomatosis who enters a clinical trial benefits from this work, whether or not they know the name REiNS.
reinscollab.org →“New Approaches to Clinical Trials for Rare Diseases: Decentralized Trial Design for Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and Schwannomatosis”
Cancers 2026;18(15):2463. doi: 10.3390/cancers18152463
Abstract & key data
Abstract
Background: In decentralized clinical trials, some or all activities occur outside of traditional sites, which may reduce time away from school/work and decrease participation burden for patients and their parents/caregivers. This methodology may improve recruitment and retention in studies, which is important for rare diseases like neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and schwannomatosis (SWN). Published guidance exists for the general conduct of decentralized trials, but specific considerations for clinical trial design and endpoints in NF1/SWN have not yet been explored. Methods: The Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis (REiNS) International Collaboration is a group of researchers, clinicians, and people affected by NF1 and SWN whose shared goal is to advance clinical trial methodology for NF1/SWN. In December 2023, REiNS members met to discuss the opportunities and challenges of conducting NF1/SWN decentralized trials. Results: Endpoints that are promising for use in NF1/SWN decentralized trials include visual acuity (as tested by the computerized amblyopia treatment study HOTV testing algorithm); electronic versions of REiNS-recommended patient-reported outcome measures; digital health technologies for functional outcomes; radiography and computed tomography scans for imaging outcomes; remote photography to assess cutaneous neurofibromas; "e-centralized" evaluations of neurocognitive functioning; and remote biomarkers collected with analyte stabilizing tubes and self-collection devices. Conclusions: Further research is necessary to validate endpoints for decentralized trials for NF1/SWN and evaluate their feasibility. However, trial designs that incorporate decentralized elements hold considerable promise for rare diseases like NF1/SWN where patients encounter significant barriers to traditional clinical trial participation.
“Development and Initial Validation of the Quality of life Evaluation in NF2-related Schwannomatosis Trials (QUEST) Assessment”
medRxiv preprint doi: 10.64898/2026.06.09.26355287
Abstract & key data
Abstract
Individuals with NF2-related schwannomatosis (NF2-SWN) experience a complex constellation of physical, emotional, and social symptoms that substantially impact quality of life (QoL). Although disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly important for evaluating treatment benefit in clinical trials, existing NF2-SWN QoL measures have limitations in content coverage and sensitivity to change. This study describes the development and initial validation a new disease-specific QoL assessment - the Quality of Life Evaluation in NF2-related Schwannomatosis Trials (QUEST). Using a three-phase, mixed-methods approach, items were generated through concept elicitation interviews with individuals with NF2-SWN and clinicians, prioritized via patient survey data, and refined through iterative cognitive debriefing procedures. The resulting 21-item QUEST assesses the extent to which NF2-SWN has negatively impacted a person's daily life over the past seven days. Initial psychometric evaluation was conducted in an international sample of 174 individuals with NF2-SWN aged 15 years and older (117 women (67%), 158 White individuals (89%)). Exploratory factor analysis supported a four-factor structure, and the total score demonstrated excellent internal consistency and strong test–retest reliability. Evidence of construct validity was demonstrated through hypothesized associations with disease-specific, generic, and domain-specific QoL measures, as well as known-groups validity based on self-reported disease severity and number of prior surgeries. Incremental validity analyses indicated that QUEST explained unique variance beyond existing measures. Together, findings support the QUEST as a reliable and valid disease-specific QoL measure with strong content validity and feasibility for use as a clinical trial endpoint in NF2-SWN.
“Recommendations for the collection and annotation of biosamples for analysis of biomarkers in neurofibromatosis and schwannomatosis clinical trials”
Clinical Trials 2024;21(1):40–50. doi: 10.1177/17407745231203330
Abstract & key data
Abstract
Introduction: Neurofibromatosis 1 and schwannomatosis are characterized by potential lifelong morbidity and life-threatening complications. To date, however, diagnostic and predictive biomarkers are an unmet need in this patient population. The inclusion of biomarker discovery correlatives in neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis clinical trials enables study of low-incidence disease. The implementation of a common data model would further enhance biomarker discovery by enabling effective concatenation of data from multiple studies. Methods: The REiNS biomarker working group reviewed published data on emerging trends in neurofibromatosis 1 and schwannomatosis biomarker research and developed recommendations in a series of consensus meetings. Results: Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising assay for neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis biomarker discovery and validation. The working group reviews recommendations for a range of biomarkers in clinical trials, NF1/schwannomatosis-specific data annotations, and common data models for data integration. Conclusion: These REiNS consensus guidelines are intended to provide best practices for the inclusion of biomarker studies in neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis clinical trials, data and sample annotation, and to lay a framework for data harmonization and concatenation between trials.
“Gene-targeted therapy for neurofibromatosis and schwannomatosis: The path to clinical trials”
Clinical Trials 2024;21(1):51–66. doi: 10.1177/17407745231207970
Abstract & key data
Abstract
Numerous successful gene-targeted therapies are arising for the treatment of a variety of rare diseases. At the same time, current treatment options for neurofibromatosis 1 and schwannomatosis are limited and do not directly address loss of gene/protein function. In addition, treatments have mostly focused on symptomatic tumors, but have failed to address multisystem involvement in these conditions. Gene-targeted therapies hold promise to address these limitations. However, despite intense interest over decades, multiple preclinical and clinical issues need to be resolved before they become a reality. The optimal approaches to gene-, mRNA-, or protein restoration and to delivery to the appropriate cell types remain elusive. Preclinical models that recapitulate manifestations of neurofibromatosis 1 and schwannomatosis need to be refined. The development of validated assays for measuring neurofibromin and merlin activity in animal and human tissues will be critical for early-stage trials, as will the selection of appropriate patients, based on their individual genotypes and risk/benefit balance. Once the safety of gene-targeted therapy for symptomatic tumors has been established, the possibility of addressing a wide range of symptoms, including non-tumor manifestations, should be explored. As preclinical efforts are underway, it will be essential to educate both clinicians and those affected by neurofibromatosis 1/schwannomatosis about the risks and benefits of gene-targeted therapy for these conditions.
“Neurofibromatosis Clinical Trials — REiNS Collaboration 2020 Recommendations”
Neurology 2021;97(7 Suppl 1):S1–S3. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012429
Abstract & key data
Abstract — summary (full text paywalled)
Editorial introduction to the third REiNS supplement to Neurology, covering 2020 recommendations from the Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis International Collaboration. Summarizes the expansion of REiNS working groups since the 2016 supplement and the acceleration of NF clinical trial activity following selumetinib's FDA approval in April 2020 for pediatric NF1-related plexiform neurofibromas — the first approved drug for any NF. The supplement introduced new REiNS working group output on cutaneous neurofibromas (measurement, biomarkers, patient perspectives), NF2-SWN hearing outcomes, social skills and neurocognitive endpoints in NF1, patient engagement methodology, biomarker measurement, and imaging of plexiform neurofibromas. Recommendations apply across NF1, NF2-related schwannomatosis, and schwannomatosis subtypes.
“Current Recommendations for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Assessing Domains of Quality of Life in Neurofibromatosis Clinical Trials”
Neurology 2021;97(7 Suppl 1):S50–S63. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012421
Abstract & key data
Abstract — summary (full text paywalled)
REiNS patient-reported outcome (PRO) working group systematic review and recommendations for measuring quality of life (QoL) in clinical trials across all neurofibromatosis conditions, including NF1, NF2-related schwannomatosis (NF2-SWN), and schwannomatosis (SWN). The paper reviews existing self-report and parent-report PRO measures across multidimensional QoL domains relevant to NF trials — covering pain intensity, global health, disease-specific functional impact, and emotional wellbeing. For NF2-SWN, the Neurofibromatosis 2 Impact on Quality of Life scale (NFTI-QoL) is recommended as the primary disease-specific PRO. For SWN pain, the PROMIS Pain Intensity and Pain Interference scales are recommended. The recommendations establish a framework for endpoint selection in psychosocial and pharmacological trials across NF subtypes. Context: the paper was published in the same year as the first FDA-approved drug for NF, making standardized QoL measurement in subsequent trials critically important.